RSS Feed

Tag Archives: i fail

Here a Trigger, There a Trigger

Yeah, okay. This is stupid. But apparently I trigger on individual words. “I must disabuse you of this notion” does not mean “I must abuse you” in any sense whatsoever, but argh, my brain is stupid and so am I.

*headdesk*
*headdesk*
*headdesk*

Update: Vorkosigan Saga Was Never Fanfic

Someone decided I needed to be disabused of the notion that the Vorkosigan Saga was ever Star Trek fanfiction. Damien’s comment here.

I can still see the Star Trek influences in the first book, but I’m not sure whether that means I’m still insulting Bujold by saying that. :-( I never meant to insult her and am terribly sorry if I did so.

And these days I don’t think fanfiction is an indication of not being creative and incapable of being original—indeed, the rest of the original post was about how her creation ended up being different from Star Trek even in the first book.

But hey. I love her works as their own thing, and I don’t really care if they were ever fanfiction or not.

PTSD: No, I Don’t Get Free Passes

All you who read this blog know I’m mentally ill with regards to having the bipolar and having the PTSD, neither of which play nice with me or my thinking process, and especially not together.

Have I said stupid things during this time?

Yes, I have. Really insane things at times. You would not believe it of me.

I’ve apologized afterwards, but the fact is, what I said still hurt people and was still insensitive and, in some cases, still threatening, regardless of whether or not I was “off my meds” (literally or not).

Is it my fault?

Well, pretty much, yes. The only person who can take responsibility is me, so I am taking it. If I left it to the bipolar or the PTSD it’d be a world of trouble for me and anyone who knows me.

I could blame it on my parents—honestly, I actually could. But it wouldn’t really help anybody, and wouldn’t even help me feel better.

Can I always prevent the bipolar/PTSD from making me stupid?

Of course fucking not. They’re mental illnesses, not mental attitudes. But I watch myself as closely as possible when I feel like I’m going off… and I do try things (various, different things with and without my psychologist’s help) to help mitigate any insanity I may inflict upon other people.

But in the end, I’m still responsible, and it’s up to me to apologize and take action. Claiming it’s just because of my PTSD and bipolar is nice and all, and perhaps even true at times. But in the end, people get hurt, and the best person to prevent such going-ons is me.

Even if I have to commit myself one day. It’s a day I hope never happens, but you know. If it has to happen, I hope I can decide for myself that it should happen.

In general, I find the people who are angriest about PTSD in others existing are people who think we just get free passes for our crazy. I can tell you we don’t.

Where was I? Oh yes.

Free passes are a mug’s game.

The Thing About Apologies and Being a Dick

Sometimes I act like a dick. We all have at some point, but that does not excuse nor lessen dickishness.

I did this pretty recently (as in a couple hours ago). Oh Internets, how you shorten time so drastically.

It all began with someone on Twitter appearing to claim that I recommended his website:

kendawes: RT @ArachneJericho: @mightymur #wordpress The Web Mechanic’s “10 Steps to WordPress Security Protection” http://nn.nf/1bfop [link]

I never tweeted that to Mur Lafferty (who had a site hacked, unfortunately). The RT above appears to claim I did. Perhaps it was an innocent mistake; some Twitter client software (like Tweetdeck, which Ken Dawes used) like to automate things a little too much.

So I asked Ken Dawes why he had done this:

arachnejericho: @kendawes I never tweeted that. I don’t know why you’re claiming I did. @mightymur [link]

Which was fine, sort of; I shouldn’t have acted like he meant it when it was quite possible this was just a misunderstanding/mistyping/whatnot.

And what really wasn’t fine was when I went immediately off the deep end, for reasons I’m not quite sure of—though regardless, if they were there, they were neither relevant nor good reasons.

Here’s me, a complete idiot with over-aggressive tendencies, going off the deep end:

arachnejericho: .@kendawes OH, I get it. You’re a spammer. I never recommended you for WordPress security advice, much less payment for such. I never will. [link]

arachnejericho: OH FFS. Now other people are claiming I RT’d you, @kendawes. I would not recommend you if you were the last guy on earth who knew this stuff [link]

(Context for the second tweet: a retweet bot had picked up on the keywords involved in Ken Dawes’ tweet.)

To which Ken Dawes replied:

kendawes: @ArachneJericho Yep I don’t know you either… However I don’t speak poorly of those I don’t even know [link]

kendawes: @ArachneJericho Nor am I responsible for what others retweet … By the way… The wordpress tips are offered for free Get a life! [link]

And really, I deserved all that he said. I made assumptions that were grossly incorrect (e.g., that he charged for his services, when he didn’t; although web traffic driving is another concern, but not anywhere in the same league) and assumed he was spamming, when he wasn’t. Even if he had mis-represented me earlier intentionally, he did not deserve that heap of abuse I heaped upon him.

Big failure on my part. I sent him the question again (why the claim) and an apology as well, although it is really a half-arsed one, but 140 characters is occasionally difficult to deal with:

arachnejericho: @kendawes I don’t take kindly to others putting words in my mouth. You did. You never apologized even when I brought it to your attention. [link]

arachnejericho: .@kendawes However, I do agree that I took things too far and insulted you for no good reason. For that, I apologize. [link]

However, note that I still acted like a dick. Which, no matter how justified it might actually be—and there’s a possibility it’s not in this case, everything being a mistake and all—is a dickish thing to do. You’d think I’d have learned from previous, vicarious observations of Internet conversations… but no, I had to be a dick multiple times, even with an apology.

So here is a real apology for my over-responsive dickishness:

Dear Ken Dawes,

My sincerest apologies for acting like a dick to you for one single tweet, which was most likely a mistake. However, whether or not that was the case, I completely over-reacted and made idiotic assumptions about you from that single tweet.

If I had thought about it further, I should have just shrugged and let it pass, because, you know, it’s not a big thing.

However, I chose instead to act like a dick. And that was stupid.

I am sorry I acted like a dick. I will keep this in mind next time, and do my best to not be a dick in similar situations.

Of course, it would have helped tons for me to not have over-reacted to little niggling things in the first place.

Sincerely,
Arachne Jericho

And perhaps I’m over-reacting, but hell, I over-reacted in the first place anyways. And perhaps someone will claim that this is all just an attempt to bring about attention on myself, because I’m just an attention whore and sick in the head; well, all I can say is that I’m not, and I simply just feel horrible whenever I over-step and act like a dick. Maybe over-horribly.

Anyways, there are two more tenets about Internet conversation I should keep in mind (and should have kept in mind):

  1. Bringing about a situation in which another party feels you did them harm, whether or not it is “true”, whether or not they would care about your apology, is being a dick.

  2. Even if you apologize, you should never expect the apology to be accepted. Because you were being a dick. But not making the apology in the first place… is being more of a dick.

However, that all still boils down to: “Don’t be a dick.”

And there we are.

Nick Mamatas Calmly Brings the Hammer Down on Spinrad

Note: I set up an unfortunate implication in both the title and the following paragraph that “calm and white” should be listened to over “angry and non-white” posts. I hadn’t yet seen N. K. Jemisin’s highly relevant and very good post when I wrote this post—and it was also stupidly presumptuous of me to have remarked upon “most calm” even before a day had passed vis a vis the Spinrad Incident. Apologies for my own FAIL here. This post is otherwise unmodified, because BAHLETION fixes nothing, and should be read with this note in mind.

Indeed, of all the reactions to Norman Spinrad’s recent fail of the week, Nick Mamatas’ is the most reasoned, informative, and calm. Read his column on Haikasoru, “World SF, Worth Reading BEFORE developing an opinion”:

The problem is that Spinrad is just making an appeal to ignorance. He’s not familiar with the many writers of world SF, so he assumes they do not exist. For whatever reason, though he could be familiar with Japanese SF as some of it has been translated into English, he decided to ignore actually existing Japanese SF. He also utterly ignores Chinese SF, which has been a going concern since 1904 at least. China is also the home of Science Fiction World, the most widely read SF magazine on the planet.

[more at Haikasoru]

I think Norman Spinrad just decided he already knew enough, and didn’t need to do the research. Old dog, tricks, etc.

I really must add a wisdom-of-nick-mamatas tag.

As to Norman Spinrad:

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.